Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dan Kearns's avatar

Not at all too satirical or mean-spirited. It’s after big enough game that it earns a right to some real punch.

Expand full comment
Mosby Woods's avatar

I found the story gratifying, particularly the peevish complaints of key characters animated by the plot. I shouted Whoah to the happy ending, which reminded me of The Lady with the Dog (by the Russian doctor with the pince-nez). The hassle you wished to avoid by delaying publication (if I understand right) makes sense but fits with the theme. The uncanny speech you refer to in comments reminds me the question of "telling it slant" and (angry, political) direct speech . In contrast, Nabokov's treatment of ghost (or phantom suggestions, unclear but pregnant possibilities merging with the other character's stresses) require labor and detective work that could be easily missed. It's so gratifying to perceive, but in fact I only read N's stories after I found out that there was a code. In one example, the code was an explicit first-letter-code within a sentence. In another, a ghost was a strange shadow. My instinct (and received opinion maybe) tells me telling it slant is better as art, but also that few to none these days will read it, and if they do, decode it. By "these days" I mean highly ideological, and also hyper-sensitive, radical, unreal, and enforced, touch points in your story. How to respond against jargon, lies, coercion and decline? It makes sense that a fictional academic character of the classic values would spell it out, even more so after death as a spirit literally or narratively. Nabokov loved Lady with the Dog. I hope you will safely publish the story on Kindle some day, before ghosthood. Thanks for posting it here. Woooooaaauuuuhh (ghost noise?)

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts